Godly alternative for website design inspiration

We run DesignPorn, so we are one of the options below. We say plainly where the others are the better pick.

What happened to Godly?

Typing godly.website today sends you, with a 301 status code, to recent.design. A 301 means the move is permanent. Recent describes itself as design inspiration and mixes several feeds: web, interface, branding, motion, illustration, posters and print, plus launch videos, OG images, app screenshots and app icons. It also lists design jobs.

So the people behind the redirect have folded the traffic into a wider feed. That is good news if you liked the taste. It is less good if you relied on Godly for one thing: a tight list of website homepages you could scan before starting a new site.

The best Godly alternatives compared

Read the table by the job you have. If you want to browse for an evening and fill your eye, the first four are excellent. If a client brief is due on Friday and you need ten references in one style, with colors and fonts named, a search tool saves the scrolling.

What is the best alternative to Godly?

The best alternative to Godly depends on how you use inspiration. For the same browse-and-scroll habit, Recent is the direct successor because godly.website now redirects there, and Awwwards is the strongest source of standout web craft. For finding a specific look fast, DesignPorn is the better fit, because you search websites by style or screenshot.

Recent, the direct successor

Recent is where Godly's address points now, so it is the natural first stop. It covers more than websites, which makes it a good daily feed for a designer who works across web, brand and motion. There is no search box on the front page, so you browse category tabs rather than ask for a look.

Awwwards, for award-level craft

Awwwards shows websites picked by a jury of designers and developers. It is the place to see the top end of motion, typography and interaction. The work leans experimental, so check whether a reference suits a real product with a budget and a conversion goal before you show it to a client.

Land-book and Lapa Ninja, for landing pages

Both are long-running galleries of landing pages you can filter by category. They help when the job is a launch page or a SaaS homepage and you want to see many layouts side by side. Neither breaks a page down into colors, fonts and spacing, so you still do that part by hand.

DesignPorn, for searching by style

DesignPorn is a curated library of the top 1 percent of websites, landing pages, SaaS sites, pricing pages, dashboards, branding, logos and packaging. It works differently from a gallery:

• Search by style in plain words. Type "dark editorial agency homepage" or "calm fintech pricing page" and get ranked matches across every category.
• Find similar from a screenshot. Drop a client's current site or a competitor's homepage on the find similar designs page and get the nearest designs, with the reasons each one matched.
• A breakdown of every design. The palette with the share of each color, the heading and body fonts, and the spacing base unit, ready to paste into a brief.

It is smaller than the big galleries on purpose, and it does not record motion or video. If animated, award-style work is what you want, Awwwards is the stronger source.

Is there a Godly alternative with search?

Yes. DesignPorn is a Godly alternative with real search: you describe the look in plain words or upload a screenshot, and it returns the closest websites in the library, ranked. Awwwards, Land-book and Lapa Ninja offer filters and tags, which narrow a list but do not understand a phrase like "warm serif homepage with big product photos".

Search matters most when you work to a deadline. A designer browsing for fun enjoys the scroll. A designer who has to send a client three directions by Thursday wants the right ten references in two minutes, then a board shared by private link so the client can comment without an account.

Godly alternatives for agencies and in-house teams

Most free galleries are built for one person browsing. Agencies and product teams have extra needs that decide which tool they pay for:

1. A shared library. Five designers saving into five private accounts means the same reference gets found five times. DesignPorn Team includes five seats and shared boards.
2. Client-ready boards. A pitch needs references with credits and source links, sent by a link the client can open without signing up.
3. Design data, not only the picture. Developers and copywriters need the hex values, the font names and the spacing unit. A screenshot alone starts an argument.
4. Alerts. Save a search or watch a competitor and get an email when new matches or a redesign land. If you track competitors closely across pricing and ads too, a dedicated tool for monitoring competitor website changes covers the rest of that job.

If none of those apply, a free gallery is enough and you should keep using one.

How much does a Godly alternative cost?

Recent, Awwwards galleries, Land-book and Lapa Ninja can all be browsed without paying, and some sell extra features or memberships on top. DesignPorn is a paid tool: Pro is $24 a month billed yearly for one designer, and Team is $74 a month billed yearly for five seats, shared boards, private client links and monthly trend reports. Your first style search and your first screenshot upload work without an account. See every plan on the pricing page.

The honest test is time. If finding and documenting references for a new site takes you two hours by hand, and a search tool cuts that to twenty minutes, Pro pays for itself on the first project.

How to replace Godly in your workflow

1. Keep a feed for taste. Follow Recent or Awwwards for daily exposure to new work. That replaces the habit.
2. Use search for briefs. When a project starts, describe the look you need in DesignPorn, or upload the client's current site, and pull ten references with their palettes and fonts.
3. Save to one shared board. Put the picks on a board for the project and share it with the client by private link.
4. Check the landing pages. For launch work, compare against our landing page examples, each broken down by color, type and layout.